SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4316

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
AMBOOKAN KOCHUVARKEY MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
For the Respondents: SMT.NIMA JACOB, SHRI.SHEEJO CHACKO, SRI.C.A.CHACKO, SRI.SONITH THOMAS CHACKO

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both cases submits that a memo has been filed seeking permission to withdraw the writ petitions, with liberty to move again, if any further grievance arises in future.

Permission is granted and the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as referred to above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top