IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
ALICE ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The relief sought for by the petitioners in both the writ petitions is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to revise the assessment of tax of their shop rooms (Room No.111 in respect of the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.31446 of 2022 & Room No.112 in respect of the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.31627 of 2022) excluding the tax levied for common area including cellar. Exts.P3 and P4 are the representations preferred by the petitioners in W.P.(C)No.31627 of 2022 & W.P.(C)No.31446 of 2022 respectively, in this regard, before the 2nd respondent and the petitioners seek for an expeditious disposal of the same.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation did not object to the same.
Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, the above writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent, to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 representations preferred by the petitioners in W.P.(C)No.31627 of 2022 & W.P.(C)No.31446 of 2022 respectively, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners, within an outer limit of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.