Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
ALICE ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court addressed the need for a tax assessment revision. (Para 1) |
| 2. the court acknowledged the respondent's lack of opposition. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
The relief sought for by the petitioners in both the writ petitions is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to revise the assessment of tax of their shop rooms (Room No.111 in respect of the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.31446 of 2022 & Room No.112 in respect of the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.31627 of 2022) excluding the tax levied for common area including cellar. Exts.P3 and P4 are the representations preferred by the petitioners in W.P.(C)No.31627 of 2022 & W.P.(C)No.31446 of 2022 respectively, in this regard, before the 2nd respondent and the petitioners seek for an expeditious disposal of the same.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation did not object to the same.
Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, the above writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent, to consider and pass orders on Exts.P3 and P4 representations preferred by the petitioners in W.P.(C)No.31627 of 2022 & W.P.(C)No.31446 of 2022 respectively, in accordance with law, after affording
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
