Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
VIJESH KUMAR K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the crime and allegations. (Para 2) |
| 2. court's assessment of evidence and prior offenses. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. arguments for and against bail. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS )
seeking regular bail.
2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.1082/2025 of Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126 (1), 115(2), 351(2) and 109(1) r/w Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on
18.12.2025 at 6.00 p.m at Varode, due to previous animosity towards the defacto complainant, the accused wrongfully restrained the defacto complainant, beat him with hand, threatened to kill him, pierced on the neck of the defacto complainant with knife and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.P.Jayaram, the learned counsel for the applicants and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
