SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4328

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
SAMBATH. K. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 522 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.SUDHEER, SRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SPL PP RAJESH A, SRPP REKHA.S

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in serious economic offences where substantial evidence of collusion exists, necessitating custodial interrogation.

Headnote:(1) The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning his alleged involvement in misappropriation of funds totaling ₹15 Crores under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. The prosecution asserts significant offences were committed by the accused, with evidence of financial transactions indicating collusion. (2) The court framed the issue of the necessity for custodial interrogation of the petitioner and established the gravity of the allegations surrounding the role of the accused in a conspiracy to misappropriate government funds. The court articulated that anticipatory bail is untenable in cases involving serious economic offences. (3) Ultimately, the petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed, directing the petitioner to comply with the investigation process as mandated.

Table of Content
1. allegations of misappropriation of funds. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. judicial reasoning on the seriousness of economic offences. (Para 2 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments regarding the role and knowledge of the accused. (Para 5 , 8)

ORDER

Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , by the 3rd accused in Crime No.VC-06/2025/SIU-II of VACB Special Investigation Unit-II, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the prosecution. Perused the relevant records.

3. In this matter, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 409 , 465, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 13 (1)(a) r/w 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PC (Amendment) Act, 2018’) by the accused persons. The summary of the case, as stated in paragraph No.4 of the statement filed by the Investigating Officer, is as under:

“Samgeeth K. (A1), while working on deputation as Lower Division Clerk in the Kerala State Lottery Agents and Sellers Welfare Fund Board during the period from 14.08.2014 to 31.07.2019 was in charge of Establishment Seat-I and solely responsible for maintaining registers such as the cash book, office expenses register, cheque books, etc. By abusing his official position as a public servant and by adopting corrupt and illegal means, he dishonestly and fraudulently misappropriated an amount of ₹15,00,000/- on 30.07.2018 by illegally transferring the said amount from the current account No.67074237845 of the Kerala State Lottery Agents and Sellers Welfare Fund Board maintained with the State Bank of India, Statue Branch, Thiruvananthapuram, to his personal Account No.99980104910190 maintained with the Federal Bank, Statue Branch, Thiruvananthapuram. Further, on 31.07.2018, he misappropriated an amount of ₹64, 35,000/- by transferring the same from Savings Bank Account No.67074236863 of the Kerala State Lottery Agents and Sellers Welfare Fudn Board maintained with the State Bank of India, Statue Branch to Account No.556401010050179 of Anilkumar C. (A2) maintained with Union Bank, Kumarapuram Branch. These amounts, which were entrusted to him in his official capacity and under his control, were misappropriated by preparing forged cheques, failing to record the transactions in the relevant registers, and using the forged cheques as genuine. By doing so, he obtained undue pecuniary advantage for himself and for another, thereby causing corresponding financial loss to the Kerala State Lottery Agents and Sellers Welfare Fund Board.”

4. While canvassing anticipatory bail to the petitioner, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the petitioner who is arrayed as the 3rd accused in this crime is the direct younger brother of the 1st accused and while he was studying for BDS course, some bank transactions were made in his accounts by the 1st accused and also, properties were purchased in his name. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the 1st accused informed the 3rd accused that the funds used for the same were the funds raised from the real estate business.

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation and therefore, his arrest may be avoided by granting anticipatory bail since his involvement in this crime is not akin to that of the 1st accused, who is his brother.

5. The Special Public Prosecutor zealously opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and according to the learned Special Public Prosecutor, initially, FIR was registered alleging misappropriation of ₹1.65 Crore from the Welfare Fund of the Lottery Department by the 1st accused and now, on investigation, it is found that the misappropriation would come to the tune of ₹15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top