SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4331

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
KARUN SIVADAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: KUM.KRISHNA RAJENDRAN, SRI.NAVANEETH.N.NATH, SMT.ABHIRAMI S., SHRI.ABDUL LATHEEF P.M., SHRI.K.S.BINOY
For the Respondents: SRI. SREEJITH V.S., SR.GP

Judgement Key Points

Understood. I am ready to analyze the legal document you provide.

Please paste the content of the document (or the specific text you wish me to analyze). Once provided, I will:

  1. Extract the key points based on that content.
  2. Format the output to strictly adhere to your referencing rules:
    • Using square brackets for references (e.g., (!) ).
    • Listing each reference separately without combining them (e.g., (!) (!) ).
    • Ensuring the tag is used if I need to reference the full context in a specific format, or simply analyzing the text provided.

Please provide the document content now.


JUDGMENT

On noticing the disinclination of this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach other appropriate authorities.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top