SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
BEENA VINOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 9577 OF 2022 | CRIME NO.561/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANIL PRASAD, SRI.SABU P.JOSEPH, SRI.C.N.SREEKUMAR, SMT.MANJU PAUL, SHRI.TONY GEORGE THOMAS, SMT.ARYA K.K.
For the Respondents: SHRI. BREEZ M.S., SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI.N.C.MOHANAN, SHRI.ATHUL TOM, SMT.SUJITHA S.M

A Criminal Miscellaneous Case may be dismissed as infructuous if the concerns raised become irrelevant or moot during proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment addresses procedural issues surrounding the Criminal Miscellaneous Case as defined under relevant statutes. The petitioner contended that the case was infructuous based on submissions made by counsel. The court determines that the matter has become inconsequential. The primary issue framed was whether the case is still relevant for proceedings, leading to the conclusion. The judgment culminated in the dismissal of the case as infructuous.

ORDER

Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Criminal Miscellaneous Case became infructuous.

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top