SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4338

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
BEENA VINOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANIL PRASAD, SRI.SABU P.JOSEPH, SRI.C.N.SREEKUMAR, SMT.MANJU PAUL, SHRI.TONY GEORGE THOMAS, SMT.ARYA K.K.
For the Respondents: SHRI. BREEZ M.S., SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI.N.C.MOHANAN, SHRI.ATHUL TOM, SMT.SUJITHA S.M

ORDER

Dated this the 28th day of January, 2026 The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Criminal Miscellaneous Case became infructuous.

Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top