SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4349

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
MUHAMMED SHAFI.E. – Appellant
Versus
AMINA.S. – Respondent
OP (FC) NO. 51 OF 2026 | Restoration Petition 62/2025 IN OP(G&W) NO.1740 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.M.SANEER, SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED, SHRI.AKHIL ISSAC LEESON, SMT.SAINA SALIM

Timeliness in Family Court proceedings is mandated to expedite justice.

Headnote:The legal provisions regarding the Family Court's jurisdiction guide the procedural adherence in matters concerning restoration petitions. The petitioner sought a direction for timely disposal of the restoration petition by the Family Court. The Court, finding the proposed time frame reasonable, allowed the petition. Essential questions revolved around the procedural timeline and the Court's authority to ensure expediency in Family Court matters. Ultimately, the Court directed the Family Court to comply with the suggested timetable.

Table of Content
1. the petitioner requested an expedited hearing for a restoration petition. (Para 1 , 2)
2. the family court suggested a reasonable time frame for resolution. (Para 3 , 4)

Devan Ramachandran , J.

The limited plea of the petitioner is that the learned Family Court, Neyyattinkara, be directed to take up RP No.62/2025 in OP(G&W) No.1740/2023 and dispose it of within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. Hearing Sri.P.M.Saneer – appearing for the petitioner on the afore lines, on 22.01.2026, we called for a report from the learned Family Court, which is now available.

3. The learned Family Court reports that the RP in question was filed on 11.11.2025, to be listed to 11.12.2025 for return of summons; and that, pursuant thereto, she appeared on 11.12.2025. It says that the matter is now listed to 03.02.2026 for objections and that it will be disposed of approximately within a period of two months thereafter.

4. We find the time frame suggested by the learned Family Court to be absolute.

In the afore circumstances, we allow this Original Petition and direct the learned Family Court, Neyyattinkara, to abide by the time frame it has suggested to us in its report dated 24.01.2026.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA JUDGE stu APPENDIX OF OP (FC) NO. 51 OF 2026 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.P.NO.152/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top