SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4352

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
RAMSIYA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 4713 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.T.S.SARATH, SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI RENJIT GEORGE, SR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court allows withdrawal of a criminal motion while preserving the petitioner's rights for future challenges.

Headnote:The High Court of Kerala, addressing Crl.M.C No. 4713 of 2020, allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the motion, retaining the right to contest all issues before the Trial Court. The court emphasized that while the petitioner can be exempted from appearing except when her presence is crucial, the withdrawal was recognized and permission granted under procedural considerations.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C, leaving open the option to raise all challenges before the Trial Court.

Permission granted.

The Crl.M.C stands closed as withdrawn.

The learned Magistrate shall grant permanent exemption to the petitioner to appear through counsel during the course of trial, except for those occasions where her presence is inevitable for the further progress of the trial.

Sd/-

G.GIRISH JUDGE IAP APPENDIX OF CRL.MC NO. 4713 OF 2020 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top