Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4354

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
KUNHAMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE POLICE CHIEF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7477 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV SRI.BABU S. NAIR
For the Respondents: ADV.N.R SANGEETHA RAJ;PP

Judicial dismissals can occur when a petitioner indicates that the case is no longer to be pursued.

Headnote:In this judgment of WP

(C) No. 7477 of 2019, the petitioner indicates the writ has become infructuous, leading to dismissal. The court reflects on the non-pressing of the petition, leading to a ruling on the merits. Hence, the judgment articulates that the petition is dismissed as not pressed.

K.BABU, J.

-------------------------------------------

WP(C) NO. 7477 OF 2019 -------------------------------------------

Dated this the 28th day of January 2026 JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the writ petition, as the petition has become infructuous.

The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner has been placed on record.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4354

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMK. BABU, JKUNHAMI – AppellantVersusTHE STATE POLICE CHIEF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – RespondentWP(C) NO. 7477 OF 2019

Judicial dismissals can occur when a petitioner indicates that the case is no longer to be pursued.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
KUNHAMI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE POLICE CHIEF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7477 OF 2019