IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL JOSE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[WP(C) Nos.26517/2019, 23238/2019]
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i) issue writ of certiorari, any other, writ or order setting aside Exhibit P6 order dated 15-12-2017 in Appeal No.270 of 2017 of the Kerala State Electricity Appellate Authority;
ii) to declare that the Exhibit P4 final bill is in order and the respondent is liable to pay the same.
iii) issue any other writ or order or direction as this Hon'ble Cour may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case;”
2. When the matter is taken up, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Board submits that the entire liability has been cleared by the 1st respondent by availing the OTS scheme. This is recorded.
Accordingly, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed as infructuous.
WP(C) No.23238/2019
3. The Kerala State Electricity Board challenges Ext.P7 order passed by the Kerala State Electricity Appellate Authority in an appeal preferred by the 3rd respondent – consumer.
4. The 3rd respondent was running an Industrial unit of manufacturing ice blocks. The electricity connection bearing Consumer No.3398 has been given to the unit under th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.