Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL JOSE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to challenge the assessment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent’s appeal against assessment based on unauthorized load. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. argument regarding misapplication of prior authority. (Para 5) |
| 4. court maintains that the prior ruling doesn’t apply. (Para 6) |
| 5. court quashes earlier order and restores the board's authority. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
[WP(C) Nos.26517/2019, 23238/2019]
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i) issue writ of certiorari, any other, writ or order setting aside Exhibit P6 order dated 15-12-2017 in Appeal No.270 of 2017 of the Kerala State Electricity Appellate Authority;
ii) to declare that the Exhibit P4 final bill is in order and the respondent is liable to pay the same.
iii) issue any other writ or order or direction as this Hon'ble Cour may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case;”
2. When the matter is taken up, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Board submits that the entire liability has been cleared by the 1st respondent by availing the OTS scheme. This is recorded.
Accordingly, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed as infructuous.
WP
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
