JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges Ext.P9 order passed by the State Information Commission. Petitioner had sought certain information regarding the employees of the Kerala State Chalachithra Academy through Ext.P1. Except for the information for question No.7, all others were furnished. The petitioner was not satisfied with the same and filed an appeal, which also resulted in a dismissal.

2. The petitioner thereafter approached the State Information Commission, which passed Ext.P9, the impugned order, on the ground that since question No.7 pertained to third- party information, notices were issued to the third party, and as they opposed supplying information, the same cannot be granted.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies on Section

4, which states the obligation of the public authority to disclose the monthly remuneration received by each of its officers and employees, including the system of compensation as provided in its regulations. Petitioner also relies on Section 11 , which contends that even if the third party is opposed to granting information, as per the proviso, except in the case of trade or commercial secrets protected by law, disclosure may be allowed if