SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4364

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
K.B.RAMACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2761 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN, SRI.SABU GEORGE
For the Respondents: SHRI.V.A.MUHAMMED, SHRI.M.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, SC, INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT-IHRD, SHRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC, IHRD

The court determined that the petitioner's requests did not warrant judicial examination, resulting in the closure of the writ petition.

Headnote:The petitioner, K.B.RAMACHANDRAN, sought a direction for passing appropriate orders regarding the confiscation of a mobile phone. The case was presented under WP

(C) NO. 2761 OF 2017. The court found that the prayers of the petitioner did not merit consideration. Thus, the writ petition was closed without further adjudication. The court concluded that nothing survives for consideration in the case.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed the writ petition seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 representation dated 30.12.2016, in relation to the confiscation of the mobile phone on 22.12.2016 from the petitioner’s son by the

3rd respondent.

Going by the prayers sought in the writ petition, it appears that nothing survives for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top