Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTRED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT,GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM – Appellant
Versus
ZAINUL ABIDEEN ABDUL HAMEED – Respondent
ORDER
This review petition is filed to review the judgment dated 27.10.2025 in W.P.(C) No.19947/2024.
2. The short point raised by the Government Pleader is that in the judgment this Court interfered with the order mainly for the reason that the District Collector, Malappuram, as per Ex.P3 order, directed to reconsider the application by the Sub Collector instead of the Revenue Divisional Officer. It is submitted that earlier the application was considered by the Revenue Divisional Officer.
3. After going through the memorandum of the review petition, I think there is some force in the argument of the Government Pleader. Hence, I think the judgment can be recalled and writ petition can be restored.
Therefore, this review petition is allowed, and the judgment dated 27.10.2025 in W.P.(C) No.19947/2024 is recalled and the writ petition is restored.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
