Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
BINU K.K., LALA BINU – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO.29160 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.G.VISWAMBHARAN
For the Respondents: M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, K.JOHN MATHAI, JOSON MANAVALAN, KURYAN THOMAS, PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM, RAJA KANNAN, AKHILA NAMBIAR

Court dismissed petition due to closure of loan account, rendering proceedings moot.

Headnote:This writ petition concerns a loan account closure, as submitted by the respondent's counsel. The court found that with the loan account being closed, there were no surviving issues in the petition and hence, decided to dismiss it. The court's framing of the issue revolves around the continuation of the writ petition given the closure of the loan account. Consequently, the court concluded that the writ petition is closed.

JUDGMENT

The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submits that the petitioner’s loan account has already been closed.

In view of the above submission, nothing survives in this writ petition and accordingly, the same is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JBINU K.K., LALA BINU – AppellantVersusCANARA BANK – RespondentWP(C) NO.29160 OF 2022

Court dismissed petition due to closure of loan account, rendering proceedings moot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
BINU K.K., LALA BINU – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO.29160 OF 2022