Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ARAVINDAKSHAN – Appellant
Versus
TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27820 OF 2016

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.T.PRADEEP, SMT.M.BINDUDAS, SHRI.JANARDHANAN PONATHILEKANDY
For the Respondents: ARUN AJAY SHANKAR

Ensuring procedural compliance in cases involving deceased petitioners allows legal representatives to pursue necessary remedies.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition, but it was reported that the petitioner has passed away. As the counsel for the petitioner had no further instructions, the court concluded the matter, allowing the deceased petitioner's legal representatives the opportunity to pursue relevant remedies. This decision underscores the procedural necessity for legal representatives to take up such matters post the petitioner’s demise.

JUDGMENT

Last time when the matter came up, it was reported that the petitioner is no more and the matter was posted today to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to take necessary steps. Today when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instruction. Therefore, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner, if any, to invoke necessary remedies.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4389

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JARAVINDAKSHAN – AppellantVersusTAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK – RespondentWP(C) NO. 27820 OF 2016

Ensuring procedural compliance in cases involving deceased petitioners allows legal representatives to pursue necessary remedies.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
ARAVINDAKSHAN – Appellant
Versus
TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNUR TALUK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27820 OF 2016