Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4390

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
KANNAMBALLI JOSEPH @ SHINOJ – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB COLLECTOR, MANATHAVADI – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8433 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADVS. K.V.PAVITHRAN
For the Respondents: SMT.M.R.MINI, SRI.VINOD RAVINDRANATH, SMT.MEENA.A, SHRI.ANISH ANTONY ANATHAZHATH, SHRI.THAREEQ ANVER, SMT.NIVEDHITHA PREM.V

A writ petition is deemed infructuous if the underlying matter is no longer viable.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the matter relating to WP

(C) No. 8433 of 2019, wherein the petitioner, having submitted that the matter had become infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. The main issue revolved around whether the proceedings could continue given the stated circumstances. The Court found the petition to be infructuous and accordingly dismissed it.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4390

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JKANNAMBALLI JOSEPH @ SHINOJ – AppellantVersusTHE SUB COLLECTOR, MANATHAVADI – RespondentWP(C) NO. 8433 OF 2019

A writ petition is deemed infructuous if the underlying matter is no longer viable.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MRS. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, J
KANNAMBALLI JOSEPH @ SHINOJ – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB COLLECTOR, MANATHAVADI – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8433 OF 2019