Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
KAREEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of non-heinous criminal proceedings based on amicable settlement. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties have resolved disputes amicably; no further prosecution desired. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. the court recognizes its inherent powers to quash proceedings based on the nature of the crime. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 1st accused in L.P.No.121/2021 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate -I, Vatakara (Trial Court), which has originated from Crime No.1250/2011 registered by the Badagara Police Station, Kozhikode, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 341, 323 and 324 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code . 2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A3 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Publ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
