Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
LAKSHMANAN.P.C. – Appellant
Versus
SURESH BABU – Respondent
RSA NO. 1092 OF 2012

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SR.), K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR, PUSHARAJAN KODOTH, K.B.VIPIN KUMAR, VANDANA MENON
For the Respondents: M.MANJU, K.R.RANJITH, R.SUDHISH

The dismissal of an appeal due to lack of instructions falls within procedural rules governing appeals.

Headnote:This case concerns the appeal against the decision from AS No.213 of 2011. The appellant, represented by multiple advocates, submitted no further instructions, leading the court to dismiss the appeal. The decisive issue was procedural in nature, concluding without consideration of merits.

J U D G M E N T

It is submitted that there are no instructions from the appellant.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMEASWARAN S., JLAKSHMANAN.P.C. – AppellantVersusSURESH BABU – RespondentRSA NO. 1092 OF 2012

The dismissal of an appeal due to lack of instructions falls within procedural rules governing appeals.

Headnote:This case concerns the appeal against the decision from AS No.213 of 2011. The appellant, represented by multiple advocates, submitted no further instructions, leading the court to dismiss the appeal. The decisive issue was procedural in nature, concluding without consideration of merits.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
LAKSHMANAN.P.C. – Appellant
Versus
SURESH BABU – Respondent
RSA NO. 1092 OF 2012