SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
V.S. ATHEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.CHITHRA S.BABU
For the Respondents: SRI.SANGEETHARAJ, PP

O R D E R

The challenge in this Crl. Revision Petition is to the judgment dated 16.12.2025 in Crl.Appeal No.105 of 2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Court - I, Alappuzha, confirming the conviction and the sentence rendered by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Alappuzha, in judgment dated 05.04.2024 in C.C.No.189 of 2021.

2. The revision petitioner is the sole accused. He has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the NI Act’) and sentenced undergo imprisonment till rising of the Court. He was also directed to pay a fine of Rs.4,00,000/-.

3. The complainant/respondent No.2 filed a complaint before the Trial Court alleging that the accused/revision petitioner executed Ext.P2 cheque for a sum of Rs.9,00,000/-. The complainant presented the cheque for encashment. It was dishonoured unpaid due to insufficiency of funds in the account of the accused. Even after the receipt of the statutory notice, the revision petitioner did not pay the amount covered by the cheque.

4. The Trial Court took cognizance of the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act. The revision petitioner appeared on summons. He pleaded not guilty to the offence alle

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top