Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4461
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANANTHA NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6109 OF 2025|WP(C) NO. 6135 OF 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
For the Respondents: SHRI.SANTHOSH P.PODUVAL, SHRI.SANTHOSH PETER (MAMALAYIL), SRI.P.N.ANOOP, SRI.M.S.SANDEEP SUDHAKARAN, SMT.MEGHA MOL S., SRI.P.S.NANDANAN, SHRI.NADEEM NAZAR
The court determined that given the nature of the orders, petitioners should pursue the matter through appropriate appeals rather than through writ petitions.
Headnote:The Writ Petitions challenge appealable orders. The Court acknowledges the petitioners' entitlement to pursue remedies through appropriate legal channels, allowing time for appeal. The Court ordered to maintain the present status for one month to facilitate the petitioners' actions.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. connected writ petitions (Para 1) |
| 2. right to appeal acknowledged (Para 2 , 3) |
JUDGMENT
These two Writ Petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these two Writ Petitions by a common judgment.
2. The impugned orders in these cases are admittedly appealable orders. If that be the case, I am of the considered opinion that these Writ Petitions need not be retained here. The petitioners are free to agitate the same before the appropriate authority in accordance with the law.
3. At this stage, the counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that a breathing time may be given to approach the appellate authority. I think that prayer can be allowed.
Therefore, these Writ Petitions are disposed of.
The status quo as on today shall be continued for a period of one month.
Sd/-
