Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
C.K. FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for quashing demand notices. (Para 1) |
| 2. conditions for processing objection and hearings. (Para 2) |
| 3. court's directive for immediate review of the petitioner's request. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“A) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibits P1, P4, P5, P6 & P7 and illegal.
B) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 4th respondent to consider the Exhibit P3 objection and pass orders with an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
C) Petitioner also prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the translation of the vernacular documents produced in the vernacular language.
D) Grant such other reliefs, which are deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration on 15.09.2023, this Court passed the following order:
“Notice before admission.
2. Learned Government Pleader takes notice for respondents 1 to 3. Learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the 4th respondent.
3. In the meantime, the proceedings pursuant to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
