Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NAZARUDEEN.K.M. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court must consider grievances regarding unauthorized operations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. directs actions on petitions without extensive notice to involved parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. the importance of providing opportunities for hearings is underscored. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction commanding the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext P3, P4, P5 and P6 after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the other private persons named above and within a reasonable time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court;
ii. Dispense with the production of English translation of vernacular documents;
iii. To pass such any other relief to deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case (SIC)
2. According to the petitioners, the party respondents are conducting a hotel without any licence or permission. The petitioners submitted Exts.P3, P4, P5 and P6 before the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent is not considering the same is the grievance.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. The manner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
