IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NAZARUDEEN.K.M. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction commanding the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext P3, P4, P5 and P6 after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the other private persons named above and within a reasonable time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court;
ii. Dispense with the production of English translation of vernacular documents;
iii. To pass such any other relief to deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case (SIC)
2. According to the petitioners, the party respondents are conducting a hotel without any licence or permission. The petitioners submitted Exts.P3, P4, P5 and P6 before the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent is not considering the same is the grievance.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. The manner in which this writ petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary to the party respondents.
4. According to the petitioners, the 2nd respondent is not considering the representations submitted by the petitioners. If that is the case, there can be a directi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.