IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SAIFUDEEN D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records relating to exhibits P1 to Ext.P10;
ii) issue a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing exhibit P10 order;
iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order or direction allowing Ext.P9 application as prayed for and in the alternative, directing the 3rd respondent to conduct a detailed enquiry as mandated in the Kerala Consideration of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 especially in the backdrop of exhibit P8 and the order passed in respect of exhibits P2 and P3 properties and to dispose of exhibit P9 application in that backdrop in a time limit to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court after having afforded an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner;
iv) dispense with the production of true English translation of the Malayalam documents produced herewith;
and v)pass such other and further orders as are deemed fit and necessary in the interests of justice.”
[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 3rd respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by him under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.