SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4478

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
NARAYANAN.M – Appellant
Versus
MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K. Mohanakannan, H. Praveen
For the Respondents: R. Ranjanie, P. B. Krishnan, M. K. Sumod, Raj Carolin V, Vidya M. K, Thushara K, Sabu George, B. Anusree, Manu Vyasaan Peter, Chithira Venugopal

Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.

When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri. K. Mohanakannan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the parties have managed to settle the issues, and in that view of the matter, the petitioner does not intend to pursue the reliefs prayed for in this Writ Petition.

In view of the above submission, this Writ Petition is closed.

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, K.V. JAYAKUMAR,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top