SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4516

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
ALPHONSA JACOB – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB REGISTRAR, THRISSUR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2444 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RANJITH XAVIER
For the Respondents: SRI. K.M FAISAL, SRI. TOM. K. THOMAS

A Sale Certificate issued under the SARFAESI Act is not a conveyance and does not require stamp duty for filing under Section 89(4) of the Registration Act, 1908.

Headnote:The court examined the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908, specifically Section 89(4), in the context of a writ petition by the successful auction purchaser regarding the refusal to file a Sale Certificate unless stamp duty is paid. The court noted that the Sale Certificate is not a 'conveyance' and is not compulsorily registrable. The decision outlined the current status of stamp duty payments on such certificates and provided directions for the Sub-Registrar to incorporate the Sale Certificate upon payment of stamp duty under protest or creating a charge over the property. The petitioner is granted the option to secure the sale certificate within specified timelines.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks mandamus for filing sale certificate without payment of stamp duty. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court discusses ongoing stamp duty payment issues pending a larger bench decision. (Para 3)
3. court establishes options for the petitioner regarding stamp duty payment. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2026)

The reliefs sought in this writ petition are as follows:

(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writ, order or direction directing the first respondent to file Ext.P1 Sale Certificate in Book No.1 of the Sub Registrar Office, Thrissur as mandated under Section 89 (4) of the Registration Act , 1908 without insisting on payment of stamp duty, creating a charge on petitioner’s property mentioned in Ext.P1, expeditiously, within a time frame that may be specified by this Hon’ble Court.

(ii) Issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case at hand to secure the ends of justice.

2. The petitioner is a home-maker and the successful auction purchaser of 3.94 Ares of land in Chiyyaram Village, Thrissur, sold by the 2nd respondent (Authorised officer, State Bank of India) under the SARFAESI Act for Rs.2,67,50,000/-. Upon confirmation of sale, Ext.P1 Sale Certificate dated 20.12.2025 was issued and forwarded to the 1st respondent (Sub-Registrar) for filing in Book No.1 under Section 89 (4) of the Registration Act , 1908; however, the first respondent refused to file the same, insisting that it be engrossed on stamp paper under the Kerala Stamp Act , 1959. The refusal is contrary to settled law that a Sale Certificate issued by a bank’s Authorised officer is not a “conveyance”, is not compulsorily registrable, and that mere filing under (4) does not attract stamp duty, as held by this Court in 2025 in WP(C) No.26278/2025 (Ext.P2). Having invested a substantial sum, the petitioner is being deprived of the benefits of the property due to the illegal stance of the first respondent and is willing to have a charge created to secure any potential stamp duty. Hence, this writ petition seeks a direction to the first respondent to file Ext.P1 in Book No.1 without insisting on immediate payment of stamp duty.

3. Regarding the question of payment of stamp duty in a sale certificate, it is now referred to a larger bench, which is still pending. In the meanwhile, any sale certificate forwarded by the Bank under Section 89 (4) of the Registration Act shall be incorporated in the Book No.1 either by collecting stamp duty under protest from such auction purchaser or making it as a charge over the property without collecting stamp duty. Option is left to the individual auction purchaser till further decision is taken in the matter by a Full Bench.

4. Given the above reasons, the petitioner has two options either to pay stamp duty under protest or make a charge over the property. If the option is exercised, the respondent shall incorporate the sale certificate, in Book No.1 within one month from the date of its presentation.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top