IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. Jayakumar, J
P.Crispin – Appellant
Versus
Jalaludeen – Respondent
ORDER This revision petition is preferred impugning the judgment of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thiruvananthapuram, in Criminal Appeal No.347/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, ‘the Act’). The above appeal was preferred, challenging the judgment in S.T.No. 34 of 2005 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Neyyattinkara, whereby the accused was found guilty.
2. The trial court sentenced the revision petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 60,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.
3. The appellate court, as per the impugned judgment, modified the sentence to imprisonment till rising of the Court and to pay compensation of Rs.62,000/- and in default of payment of compensation to suffer simple imprisonment for three months.
4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner reiterated the contentions which were raised before the courts below and got rejected concurrently. The contentions raised before me are also urging for re-appreciation of evidence, which is not permissible under the revisional jurisdiction unless any kind of perve
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.