SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. Jayakumar, J
P.Crispin – Appellant
Versus
Jalaludeen – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Smt. Vijayakumari
For the Respondents: Adv. Neema T.V., Sr.PP.

ORDER This revision petition is preferred impugning the judgment of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Thiruvananthapuram, in Criminal Appeal No.347/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, ‘the Act’). The above appeal was preferred, challenging the judgment in S.T.No. 34 of 2005 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Neyyattinkara, whereby the accused was found guilty.

2. The trial court sentenced the revision petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 60,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for one month.

3. The appellate court, as per the impugned judgment, modified the sentence to imprisonment till rising of the Court and to pay compensation of Rs.62,000/- and in default of payment of compensation to suffer simple imprisonment for three months.

4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner reiterated the contentions which were raised before the courts below and got rejected concurrently. The contentions raised before me are also urging for re-appreciation of evidence, which is not permissible under the revisional jurisdiction unless any kind of perve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top