Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. V. JAYAKUMAR, J
H.A.SUDHEER – Appellant
Versus
M.KANNAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court's observations on the evidence and established principles regarding revisional powers. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 2. arguments concerning reappreciation of evidence in revisional jurisdiction. (Para 10) |
| 3. summary of judicial ruling and order regarding sentence. (Para 12) |
ORDER This revision petition is preferred impugning the judgment of the Additional Sessions Court-I, Palakkad, in Criminal Appeal No.25/2011 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, ‘the Act’). The above appeal was preferred, challenging the judgment in C.C.No. 1145/2009 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-III, Palakkad, whereby the accused was found guilty.
2. The trial court sentenced the revision petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a compensation of Rs. 2,75,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.
3. The appellate court, as per the impugned judgment, modified and reduced the sentence to one till rising of the court and to pay compensation of Rs.2,80,000/-, keeping the default sentence intact.
4. The learned counsel for the revision petitioner reiterated the co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
