Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4623
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27054 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED
For the Respondents: SRI.G.P.SHINOD, SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN, SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN, SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR, SHRI.ATUL MATHEWS, SMT.GAYATHRI S.B., SMT.SHAHINA NOUSHAD, SHRI.REUBEN CHARLY, SHRI.KRISHNA S. KARUNAKARAN
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED
For the Respondents: SRI.G.P.SHINOD, SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN, SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN, SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR, SHRI.ATUL MATHEWS, SMT.GAYATHRI S.B., SMT.SHAHINA NOUSHAD, SHRI.REUBEN CHARLY, SHRI.KRISHNA S. KARUNAKARAN
Court confirms the mediation agreement reached between parties, leading to the disposal of the petition without further directions.
Headnote:The court analyzed the mediation agreement concerning WP
(C) NO. 27054 OF 2025, establishing that both parties have reached a settlement. The court noted that no further directions are necessary, and thus disposed of the writ petition accordingly. This judgment was delivered on January 21, 2026, and acknowledges the mediation's integral role in resolving the dispute.
JUDGMENT
When this writ petition came up for consideration, this Court referred the matter for mediation. Now both sides submitted that the matter is settled and a mediation agreement is also produced. If that is the case, no further direction is necessary.
Therefore, recording the mediation agreement, this writ petition is disposed of. The mediation agreement will form part of this judgment.
sd/-
