Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ABDUL AZEEZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition requests for procedural updates. (Para 1) |
| 2. technical compliance confirmed by authorities. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition concluded. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ order or direction commanding the respondents to consider Exhibit P5& P6 representations and update the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in relation to transfer of ownership of the vehicle in the vahan.parivahan portal in the light of Exhibit P2 rules and Exhibit P3 circular by facilitating an authorized dealer of registered vehicles under Rule 55A of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules , 1989 to access the ‘application submission page’ by generating OTP in the mobile number of the authorized dealer of registered vehicles. ii. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ order or direction commanding the respondents to update the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) in relation to transfer of ownership of the vehicle in the vahan.parivahan portal by facilitating the registration of the mobile number of the authorized dealer of registered vehicles under Rule 55A of the Central Moto
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
