Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4745
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
M/S.AMBADY TOURIST ENTERPRISES (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
K.LALAN – Respondent
RFA NO. 459 OF 2005 (D)
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.VINOD, SHRI.N.SATHEESH
For the Respondents: SMT.N.D.DEEPA, SHRI.P.GEORGE WILLIAM
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.VINOD, SHRI.N.SATHEESH
For the Respondents: SMT.N.D.DEEPA, SHRI.P.GEORGE WILLIAM
An appeal may be dismissed as infructuous when the circumstances render it impossible to proceed.
Headnote:This judgment pertains to a Regular First Appeal, where the appellant contended the case has become infructuous due to various circumstances. The court finds merit in the appellant's submission, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal as infructuous. The key legal issue framed was whether the appeal could proceed given the current circumstances. The court concluded that the appeal is indeed infructuous, dismissing it accordingly.
Result: The appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appeal has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
