SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4842

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
G.R. Mohanakumaran Nair – Appellant
Versus
Syamala Kumari Amma – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1978 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.R.S.Kalkura, Shri.M.S.Kalesh, Shri.Harish Gopinath, Shri.P.I.Najumal Hussain
For the Respondents: Sri.D.Kishore, Sri.D.Ajithkumar, SMT.MEERA GOPINATH, Sri.R.Muraleekrishnan (Malakkara), Shri.K.S.Satheesh Kumar, SMT.SREELEKHA

Legal representatives of deceased parties can be impleaded to continue the suit; the court prioritizes justice over technicalities.

Headnote:This original petition is initiated under the provision to challenge an order dismissing an application for condonation of delay and impleadment. The case relates to ongoing litigation from 2015 where legal representatives of deceased plaintiffs were sought to be added to the suit proceedings. The Court finds no justification to deny the inclusion of the legal representatives owing to the deaths. The petition is, therefore, allowed while setting aside previous dismissals and directing the lower court to ensure responsible parties are brought onto the record for the continuation of the case.

JUDGMENT

The original petition has been filed challenging an order whereby an application for condonation of delay and setting aside abatement and impleading the legal representatives of the 1st defendant has been dismissed. The suit is of 2015. The 1st plaintiff and the 3rd plaintiff also died and petitions had been filed for impleading their legal representatives also. No orders have been passed in those petitions as per the averment in the original petition. No purpose will be served by retaining this original petition on file in this Court. Even though the counsel for the respondents seriously opposed the impleading, I do not find any reason not to allow the impleading since admittedly, several persons have died and without impleading their legal representatives, the suit cannot proceed.

In the above circumstances, the original petition is allowed. Ext.P17 is set aside. IA.Nos.4408 and 4409 of 2018 in OS.No.1851 of 2015 on the file of the Additional Munsiff’s Court -II, Thiruvananthapuram stand allowed. The trial court shall proceed with the case after ensuring that the legal representatives of all the deceased parties have been brought on party array. The Court may grant time for seeking such impleadment and if the plaintiffs fail to implead within the time so granted, the Court may proceed with the suit treating the suit as abated as against the deceased persons whose legal representatives have not been impleaded.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top