Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
AJEESH C.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges tax recovery. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner claims no tax liability due to vehicle surrender. (Para 3) |
| 3. court rules on liability cessation upon financier possession. (Para 4 , 5) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner was the owner of a bus bearing registration No. KL 03 T 5035. The challenge raised in this writ petition is against Ext.P2 Revenue Recovery notice issued to the petitioner, for realising an amount of Rs.6,60,863/- as the motor vehicle tax in respect of the said vehicle. As against Ext.P2, the petitioner submitted Ext.P3 objection. The writ petition was submitted challenging Ext.P2 revenue recovery notice and also for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation submitted by the petitioner.
2. I have heard Sri. S.R.Sreejith, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Arun Ajay Shankar, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 and Sri. Binoy Vasudevan, the learned counsel appearing for the 7th and 8th respondents.
3. The specific contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, the demand of motor vehicle tax in respect of the vehicle owned by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
