Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
MUNEES T – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 45968 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitioner seeks directions regarding bank account. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank agreed to de-freeze account after receiving explanation. (Para 2) |
| 3. writ petition disposed as per bank's assurance. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 16th day of January, 2026
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to de-freeze his account maintained with the 2nd respondent Bank.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd and 3rd respondents submitted that the freezing was made on account of the suspicion on the part of the Bank and on receipt of the explanation from the petitioner, the Bank has effected de-freeze of his account and that the petitioner can operate the account.
3. Recording the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE ANB APPENDIX OF WP(C) NO. 45968 OF 2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE PASSBOOK OF BANK ACCOUNT NO. 19970100042939 MAINTAINED WITH FEDERAL BANK LTD, KANNUR/TALAP BRANCH, KANNUR DISTRICT, OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
