Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
NABEESATH SEBEENA SAHADUDDEEN – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF BARODA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to bank's lien based on police requisition without connection to crime. (Para 1) |
| 2. acceptance of the amount at the center of the lien as disputed between parties. (Para 2) |
| 3. establishes the court's previous rulings guiding current decisions on bank actions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. directive for the bank and police on handling the current account's status. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at the requisition of the Police Authorities. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime registered by the Police authorities against some other persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 & 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 ( BNSS )
and
2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/Bank, after getting instructions from the Bank, submitted that the Bank has received two Requisitions from the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 for a total amou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
