SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4922

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
P.V. MOHAMMED ABDUL KAREEM FAISAL – Appellant
Versus
BINI K.U – Respondent
Con.CASE(C) NO. 105 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.25950 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PRAVEEN.H.
For the Respondents: SR GP SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

The court ruled that a separate contempt petition is unnecessary when a related writ petition is pending.

Headnote:The case concerns a contempt petition filed against an interim order in W.P.(C.) No. 25950 of 2023. The court determined that as the writ petition is pending, a separate contempt petition is unnecessary. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an IA regarding any violations in the ongoing writ petition. The contempt case is therefore concluded based on these observations.

JUDGMENT

This Contempt Case is filed against the interim order dated 03.07.2025 in W.P.(C.) No. 25950 of 2023. Admittedly, the writ petition is pending before this Court. If that is the case, a separate contempt petition need not be retained here. The contentions raised by the petitioner is left open. The petitioner is free to file an IA in the pending writ petition, if there is any violation. Granting liberty to the petitioner to do the needful, this contempt case is closed. All the contentions raised by the petitioner in this contempt case are left open.

With the above observation, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top