Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
SANDEEP J. NAIR – Appellant
Versus
SHAILAJA V – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1728 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.JERIL BABU, SRI.SRINATH GIRISH
For the Respondents: SRI.P.V.ANOOP, SRI.PHIJO PRADEESH PHILIP, SRI.ABIN BENNY, SRI.K C MOHAMED RASHID, SRI.DENNISE JACOB SAVY

Judicial intervention is unnecessary when the matter has become infructuous.

Headnote:The court addressed the matter regarding OP

(C) NO. 1728 OF 2025, noting that the petition had become infructuous. The judgement concludes with a dismissal of the petition, emphasizing that the procedural status of the case no longer warranted judicial intervention.

JUDGMENT

When the case is taken up today, the counsel for the petitioners submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

The original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 4973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R. RAVI, JSANDEEP J. NAIR – AppellantVersusSHAILAJA V – RespondentOP(C) NO. 1728 OF 2025

Judicial intervention is unnecessary when the matter has become infructuous.

Headnote:The court addressed the matter regarding OP(C) NO. 1728 OF 2025, noting that the petition had become infructuous. The judgement concludes with a dismissal of the petition, emphasizing that the procedural status of the case no longer warranted judicial intervention.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J
SANDEEP J. NAIR – Appellant
Versus
SHAILAJA V – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 1728 OF 2025

Headnote:The court addressed the matter regarding OP

(C) NO. 1728 OF 2025, noting that the petition had become infructuous. The judgement concludes with a dismissal of the petition, emphasizing that the procedural status of the case no longer warranted judicial intervention.