Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
GIREESH KUMAR.S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges on contract termination due to procedural disagreements. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contractual rights need civil court enforcement and judicial interference is limited. (Para 3) |
| 3. extension validity and petitioner's claims do not warrant writ remedy. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed affirming rights to pursue civil remedies. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is engaged in the field of advertising, and the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the termination of the contract entered into between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent Corporation through the 4th respondent, for displaying the advertisement using hoardings, LED boards, etc., in various depots of KSRTC bus stations in Pathanamthitta District. Ext.P1 is the agreement dated 01.07.2022 executed by the petitioner with the 4th respondent. The tenure of the agreement as per in Ext.P1 was for one year commencing from 16.08.2022, which expired on 15.08.2023. Thereafter, the period was extended as per the agreements executed subsequently, with a tenure of one year each on every occasion of such extension.
2. As per the last agreement, the extension was granted up to
16.08.2025, but the said extension
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
