IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
VANIYA PEEDIKAYIL SAMAD – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 48350 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. requesting adjournment and protection from coercive measures. (Para 1) |
| 2. court finds no scope for relief as appearance date expired. (Para 2) |
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J.
-----------------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.48350 of 2025 -----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 16th day of January, 2026 JUDGMENT This writ petition is submitted by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or appropriate direction, directing the 1st respondent to grant the petitioner a reasonable adjournment or alternative date for appearance pursuant to Exhibit P1 summons;
(ii) Issue a direction that the petitioner shall not be subjected to any coercive steps, including arrest or detention, during his appearance pursuant to Exhibit P1 summons;
(iii) Issue a direction that the statement of the petitioner, if recorded, shall be strictly voluntary and in accordance with law, without any threat, inducement or compulsion;
2. Ext.P1 summons was issued to the petitioner under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 , requiring the petitioner to appear before the authorities concerned on 24.12.2025. Now, the said date is over and therefore, I do not find any scope for considering the reliefs sought in this writ petition.
Accordingly, this writ petition is closed without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.