Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SATHYAPALA S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion claims based on temporary service can be unsustainable without requisite qualifications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. high court's power is limited in reviewing tribunal decisions. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 3. supervisory jurisdiction cannot correct all tribunal errors, only manifest injustices. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. the original petition was dismissed by the high court. (Para 17) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner filed O.A(EKM)No.773 of 2024 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, seeking an order directing the respondents to give him promotion to the post of Village Officer/Revenue Inspector with effect from 02.12.2016, with all consequential benefits.
2. The petitioner-applicant, who entered service as LD Clerk/Village Assistant in the Revenue Department, on 11.11.1999, on compassionate grounds, was granted temporary promotion as UD Clerk/Special Village Officer, with effect from 23.02.2006, under Rule 13A(1)(a) of Part II of Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules (KS&SSR). As the applicant did not pass the departmenta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
