SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5003

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SREELAL. T. NAIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 434 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.2318/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.P.V.DILEEP
For the Respondents: Sri.M.C.ASHI, SR. PP

The court determines bail eligibility based on lack of evidence linking the applicant to serious offences and absence of criminal antecedents.

Headnote:The applicant, Sreelal T. Nair, seeks bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against allegations of murder. The prosecution claims that the applicant was involved in a brutal assault, though he asserts innocence and absence of evidence. The court, after reviewing submissions, highlighted the lack of weapon use and the applicant's clean prior record, resulting in granting bail subject to conditions.

Table of Content
1. background facts of applicant's alleged assault. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 5)
3. court's assessment and decision to grant bail. (Para 6)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.2318/2025 of Adoor Police Station, Pathanamthitta District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section s 296 (b), 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 118(1), and 109(1) read with Section

3(5) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant along with the remaining accused, in furtherance of their common intention to commit murder, on 07.11.2025 at 17.20 hours, at a place called Puthuval in Endiamangalam Village, had beaten the defacto complainant. The accused No.2 had beaten the defacto complainant with an iron pipe causing injuries to his head and neck.

4. I have heard Sri. Dileep P.V., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. M.C. Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on 19.1.2026. The investigation is almost over. Admittedly, the applicant did not use any weapon. It was the accused No.2 who assaulted the defacto complainant with an iron pipe causing injuries to his head and neck. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. NO. 434 OF 2026 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure-1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO.

2318/2025 OF ADOOR POLICE STATION IN PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top