JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P8, which refused permission to the petitioner for display of fireworks in connection with the festival of Sree Pandaloor Siva Bhagavathy Temple. The reasons stated in Ext.P8 is that the petitioner had not obtained necessary permission for establishing a explosive magazine; that the petitioner had not produced the public liability insurance, the risk assessment report, the on-site emergency plan, a copy of the licence for establishing magazine, the certificates to be issued to the fireworks display operator and the fireworks display assistant etc. The petitioner was directed to produce these records. However, the same has not been produced, is what is seen stated in Ext.P8. An additional reason stated is that there is no sufficient access to the temple for plying the fire engine, if necessity arise. Another reason stated is that the barricade for the security of the spectators is also not established.

2. When this matter was taken up for consideration on 29.01.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that all the records, which are made mention of in clause no.2 of page no.2 of Ext.P8 (running page no.36) ha