Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUSTHAFA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to quash charges based on amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsels establish that dispute is resolved and prosecution has no objection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court emphasizes on quashing for non-serious offences and societal harmony. (Para 6 , 7) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2026 / 10TH MAGHA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 399 OF 2026 CRIME NO.78/2022 OF Edacherry Police Station, Kozhikode AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.884 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,VADAKARA PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 2:
1 MUSTHAFA AGED 54 YEARS S/O MOIDU, PUTHIYANDIYIL (H), KURIKKILADU P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673506
2 ZEREENA AGED 48 YEARS D/O AMMAD, PUTHIYANDIYIL (H), KURIKKILADU P.O, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673506 BY ADVS.
SRI.B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL SHRI.JYOTHI R. NAIR SMT.KEERTHI VIJAYAN SMT.FEBA MARY THOMAS RESPONDENTS/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN, PIN - 682031
2 JASIM AGED 43 YEARS S/O MAMMU HAJI, JAILANI MANSIL, KUNNUMMAKKARA, ERAMALA, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 6
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
