Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
CHARLSE GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
SUJI RAJU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the initiation of a writ petition for child custody. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the custody dispute and interim arrangements. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. consideration of the family court's findings and applications. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on parental responsibilities and rights. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. changing circumstances in child custody arrangements. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. final order directing family court action. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.
The controversy in this case originally began with a Writ Petition filed by the respondent - mother, seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus, against the petitioner herein qua their child.
2. The aforesaid Writ Petition was disposed of through Ext.P4 judgment of this Court, wherein, we recorded that the child was with the father; and, with the consent of the parties, we directed that he will be with the respondent – mother overnight on certain days.
3. Thereafter, on the imputation that the wife was refusing to return the child, IA No.1/2024 was filed in the said Writ Petition, which culminated in Ext.P5 order; subsequent to which, the respondent - mother filed RP No.1105/2024 seeking that Ext.P4 judgment be reviewed, whi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
