SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5036

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
FEBINA MOHAMED SHAFI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2432 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP.

Statutory obligations require timely decisions on permit applications considering public convenience.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to grant an additional trip on an existing route for better student convenience, referencing statutory obligations. The Court acknowledges pending applications and mandates a decision within two months considering educational institutional requests. The resulting order is for the approval of the petition with specified directives.

Table of Content
1. petition to enhance transport services for educational needs. (Para 1)
2. court mandates timely action on pending applications. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers.

“i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order, directing the first respondent to grant additional trip between Malappuram and Manjeri utilising the idle time, without any change in the existing timings in respect of Stage Carriage KL-55/AM 6245 on the route Tirur -Manjeri by considering Exhibit P2 application along with Exhibit P3 and similar representations submitted by various educational institutions seeking convenience of the students, expeditiously, at any rate within a time to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court, in the interest of justice.

ii) To issue any other appropriate writ, direction or order which this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the circumstances of the case.

iii) To dispense with the filing of translation of vernacular documents;”

2. Taking note of the fact that the petitioner's application for variation of the permit is pending consideration before the first respondent, the said respondent is directed to pass orders on the same, in accordance with law, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While taking a decision, as directed above, Ext.P3 request made by the Deputy Director of Education, Malappuram, to the first respondent shall also be taken into account.

The writ petition is allowed as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top