SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5037

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
HOTEL INDRAPRASTHA, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIREESH MATHEW
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU, GP.

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“i) call for the records leading to Ext.P1 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ, order or direction;

ii) declare that Ext.P1 order is passed by the 4th respondent without complying the directions/guidelines in Ext.P2 circular;

iii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents not to close down bar license conducting by the petitioner in its hotel, Hotel Indraprastha, Karunagappally, Kollam District, in pursuance to Ext.P1 order on 27.01.2026 in connection with the festival (Makara Bharani Mahotsavam 2026) at ‘Karunagappally Pandarathuruthu Sree Mukkampuzha Devi Temple’;

iv) grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;

and v) dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents”

2. This Court had passed an interim order on 22.01.2026 staying the impugned order.

Accordingly, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top