SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
CHINNU PRASANTH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHANDAS
SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR
SRI.SABU PULLAN
SHRI.R.BHASKARA KRISHNAN
SHRI.BHARATH MOHAN
DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
For the Respondents: SMT. DEVI SHRI R.

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“i) to issue a Writ of Certiorari or such other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibit-P2 order No. DCKLM/14585/2025/M5 dated 19-01-2026 issued by the 1st respondent as it is arbitrary and illegal;

ii) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or order or direction to the 1st respondent to allow the petitioner’s Bar hotel by name ‘Hotel Diamond Fort’ to function on 27-01-2026 since the hotel is located at a distance of 4 Kms. and 300 Mtrs. away from the temple;

iii) to issue such other appropriate Writ, Order or direction as is deemed just and necessary in the circumstances of the case. iv) It is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the translation of vernacular documents.”

2. This Court had passed an interim order on 22.01.2026 staying the impugned order.

Accordingly, nothing further remains to be considered in this writ petition, and the same is closed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top