IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BAVEESH C.P. – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers.
“i. Issue a writ of Mandamus for other appropriate writs direction or orders directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P-2 application for replacement submitted by the petitioner taking into account of the law declared by this Hon’ble Court in Exhibit P-5 judgment forthwith or within a period of two weeks;
ii. Declare that the stand taken by the 2nd respondent to the effect that the application for replacement submitted by the petitioner can only be considered by the 1st respondent as illegal and as long as the permit is valid, the petitioner is entitled to replace the vehicle during the currency of the permit;
iii. Issue a writ of Mandamus for other appropriate writs direction or orders directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P-3 and issue temporary permit till a final decision is taken on the application for replacement. iv. To dispense with the production of English Translation of documents which are in vernacular language;
v. Render such other orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2. The learned Government Pleader submits that the application for a temporary permit was re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.