Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALEE KRISHNA S., J
VINOD @ VINU,S/O.BHASKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the conviction and events leading to the appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. establishment of prosecution case and evidence summation. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. judicial limitations on revisional powers and evidence appreciation. (Para 6) |
| 4. arguments supporting prosecution's evidence and its evaluation. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER
The revision petitioners are the convicts in C.C.No.1311 of
2008 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Hosdurg. As per the judgment dated 19.05.2014, the learned Magistrate convicted and sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for each of the offences under Sections 143 , 147, and 427 of the IPC , and to undergo simple imprisonment for two years for the offence under Section 457 of the . In addition to the substantive sentence, the petitioners were sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each for the offence under Section 427 of the . In default of payment of the fine, they were directed to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days. If the fine amount is realised, Rs.10,000/- each was ordered to be given to PWs1 and 2 under Section 357 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (‘Cr.P.C’ for short). Since the offence
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
