SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5063

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
M/S CK MATERIALS @ CEEKE MATERIALS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 3673 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: MR BIJU C.K, SHRI.TERRY V.JAMES, SHRI.MATHEWS K. UTHUPPACHAN, SHRI.ABRAHAM KOLLINAL
For the Respondents: SHRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, SRI.SANTHARAM.P, SMT.REKHA ARAVIND, SRI.P.G.GOKULNATH

Police protection may be sought for business operations when workers' eligibility is established, preserving rights to approach authorities.

Headnote:The writ petition filed under WP

(C) No. 3673 of 2022 seeks police protection for business activities by the petitioner, represented by its proprietor. The court noted the agreements regarding workers holding 26A cards and the commitment from respondents 6 to 9 to not object to loading and unloading. Issues regarding the legality of 26A cards were discussed, along with interim orders provided previously by the court. Ultimately, the court closed the writ petition while preserving the petitioner's rights to seek assistance from police authorities as necessary.

Table of Content
1. police protection requested for business activities. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's position on 26a cards and respondents' agreement. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition has been filed seeking police protection to the petitioner, its staff and employees to carry out business activities, loading and unloading of goods, without any hindrance from respondents 6 to 9.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the writ petition, the workers have obtained 26A cards and only those workers who are having 26A card are being engaged in the loading and unloading activities.

3. Learned counsel appearing for respondents 6 to 9 submits that they have already challenged the issuance of 26A cards and the appeals were allowed, against which a writ petition was filed by the petitioner and interim order has been granted by this Court. In the light of the above, the learned counsel appearing for respondents 6 to 9 submits that they are not intending to object to the loading and unloading in the petitioner establishment by engaging workers having 26A cards. The said submission is recorded.

In the light of the above, the writ petition is closed, leaving open the right of the petitioner to approach respondents 2 and 3 for police protection as and when required.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top