SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
N.V.BABY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.SAJI VARGHESE KAKKATTUMATTATHIL, SMT.AMALENDU A.
For the Respondents: SRI.R.HARISHANKAR, SRI.AJIT JOY

JUDGMENT

[WP(C) Nos.19217/2025, 6426/2023]

In view of the fact that the respondents are disputing the quantum of the amount claimed by the petitioner towards the bill submitted by him for the work he had done, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to invoke his civil remedies.

Permission granted and accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed subject to the above right and keeping all the contentions raised by all the parties open.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top